IFRS 16 · FRS 102 · Discount rates
Incremental borrowing rate calculator
The discount rate moves the lease liability more than any other input, and it is the one your auditor will push hardest on. Build it in three documented components — and get the evidence note with it.
Incremental borrowing rate
Build-up and evidence
Read a rate off a yield curve
Paste tenor points as years, rate% — one per line. The term-matched rate is interpolated linearly, and flat-extrapolated beyond the ends of the curve rather than inventing a trend.
Solve for the rate implicit in the lease
Where you know the fair value of the asset, this is the rate both standards require you to use in preference to an IBR. If no non-negative rate reconciles the inputs, that is a legitimate answer — use the IBR instead.
A rate is a judgement, and judgements get challenged
Record the rate against the lease, not in a spreadsheet cell nobody can explain
AuditLease makes the discount rate a documented field on every lease, with the source and the date, and locks it into an immutable audit trail. When the auditor asks where 5.6% came from eighteen months from now, the answer is already written down.
What a defensible rate looks like
Both IFRS 16 and FRS 102 define the incremental borrowing rate as the rate you would pay to borrow, over a similar term, with similar security, the funds needed to obtain an asset of similar value in a similar economic environment. Four qualifiers, and each one is a place where a single portfolio-wide rate falls down. For when the implicit rate applies instead, and how to document the judgement for audit, see the incremental borrowing rate guide.
The three-component build-up
This is the approach auditors expect, because it makes each piece separately evidenced:
- Risk-free rate. A government bond yield in the lease currency, at the tenor matching the lease term, on the commencement date. A ten-year lease takes the ten-year point, not the base rate.
- Credit spread. The margin your entity actually pays over risk-free. Your own recent facility is the best evidence; failing that, spreads on comparable debt for similar credit standing.
- Asset-specific adjustment. A lease is secured on the asset. Prime property a landlord can re-let easily supports a lower rate than specialised plant with no second-hand market. This is usually the smallest and the hardest to defend, so keep the reasoning short and concrete.
Where it goes wrong
Three recurring problems. Using one rate for the whole portfolio — defensible only where terms, security and start dates genuinely cluster, and that grouping is itself a judgement to write down. Using the base rate as the risk-free component, which ignores the term structure entirely and understates the rate on long leases. And using a rate measured at the wrong date: the IBR is set when each lease commences, and on transition it is the rate at the date of initial application — not the rate when the lease originally started.
Nominal or effective?
A 6% annual rate on a monthly-paying lease can mean 0.5% a month (nominal, rate ÷ 12) or 0.4868% a month (effective, compounding to exactly 6%). Over a ten-year lease the two conventions differ by roughly 1% of the liability. These calculators default to effective annual, the basis AuditLease itself uses, so the numbers here reconcile with the product; nominal (rate ÷ periods) remains selectable and is common in practitioner spreadsheets. Pick one, state it, and apply it consistently.
Common questions
Can I just use my bank's base rate?
No. The base rate is an overnight policy rate with no term structure and no credit risk. It bears no relation to what you would pay to borrow for ten years, and using it will understate the liability on any long lease.
Can I use one rate across all my leases?
Only where term, security and commencement date genuinely cluster — and you should document why you grouped them. A three-year vehicle lease and a twenty-year property lease should not share a rate.
What if my company has never borrowed?
Then you build the rate rather than observing it, which is exactly what the three-component method is for. Use spreads on comparable debt for entities of similar size and credit standing, and be explicit that the spread is estimated rather than observed. A group entity may be able to start from the parent's borrowing rate adjusted for its own standing.
Do I revisit the rate later?
Not routinely — the liability is not re-discounted just because rates moved. But you do use a revised rate on certain remeasurements, such as a change in the lease term or a modification. Each new lease gets its own rate at its own commencement date.